<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>PersonalFinance - Tag - botwerks</title>
        <link>http://botwerks.org/tags/personalfinance/</link>
        <description>PersonalFinance - Tag - botwerks</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>sulrich@botwerks.org (steve ulrich)</managingEditor>
            <webMaster>sulrich@botwerks.org (steve ulrich)</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:45:56 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://botwerks.org/tags/personalfinance/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
    <title>we&#39;re sweating over the wrong vulnerability</title>
    <link>http://botwerks.org/2026/05/20260514-114556/</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 11:45:56 -0500</pubDate>
    <author>steve ulrich</author>
    <guid>http://botwerks.org/2026/05/20260514-114556/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/05/how-dangerous-is-anthropics-mythos-ai.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer ">How Dangerous Is Anthropic&rsquo;s Mythos AI? - Schneier on Security</a></p>
<p>this starts out with the usual talking points about cybersecurity and the relative power of the models under discussion.</p>
<p>it lands in a very different place.</p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>2 freezers, a costco membership, impending recession</title>
    <link>http://botwerks.org/2025/03/20250320-070608-links/</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 07:06:09 -0500</pubDate>
    <author>steve ulrich</author>
    <guid>http://botwerks.org/2025/03/20250320-070608-links/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://cooking.nytimes.com/article/cheap-food-items-grocery-shopping-recipes" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer ">Cheap Food Items to Buy When They’re on Sale - NYT Cooking</a></p>
<!-- LINK_CONTENT -->
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
    <title>my odyssey through hass - the abysmal state of personal finance software</title>
    <link>http://botwerks.org/2011/07/2011-07-07-my-odyssey-through-hass-the-abysmal-state-of-personal-finance-software/</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 06:06:53 -0700</pubDate>
    <author>steve ulrich</author>
    <guid>http://botwerks.org/2011/07/2011-07-07-my-odyssey-through-hass-the-abysmal-state-of-personal-finance-software/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>once upon a time people loved quicken.</p>
<p>quicken was intuitive (and the company was more or less named along those lines)
and it just worked. then along came microsoft money. i, a blue blooded devotee
of everything UNIX, embraced that application with both arms and i might have on
occasion tried to dry hump it. yes, i loved that app. then $MSFT decided that
they were going to kill that product. don&rsquo;t they know that i ran a special,
heavily hardened VM just to have that application at my disposal?</p>
<p>then i tried <a href="http://mint.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreffer ">mint</a>, it was good, but i couldn&rsquo;t enter
transactions manually, the projection and cash flow tools were poor and the
budgeting tools were horrid. but, it was free and if you could come to terms
with the faustian bargain that was having a 3rd party collect financial
information on you, it was reasonably workable. then they got big, their feeds
and their back end started to suffer, the customer service interaction was
pretty horrid. WTF - forums? i know that&rsquo;s very web 2.0 but i need to get
resolution to these issues, not fuck around in a forum commiserating with a
bunch if like-irritated customers. if i give you money to provide me with a
reliable, secure and supported service will you hook me up? there&rsquo;s a lot to
love about what you&rsquo;ve got going there.</p>
<p>then quicken/intuit acquired them and the community puckered up their bungholes.
quicken for the mac had been a train wreck, quickbooks is an application that
pretty much everybody loathes but there really don&rsquo;t appear to be better options
so everyone just sucks it up and deals. but, there was a contrite blog posting
about how mint would be the same old mint it ever was (talk about a mixed
message) and this would provide the infusion of cash to make the enhancements,
etc. that we&rsquo;d all been clamoring for, etc. then they added goals, nice. they
improved a number of things but you still had the anemic customer care / support
and it seemed to require a lot more hand holding than you would expect something
along these lines to require.</p>
<p>we plugged along then back in feb / mar time-frame, they made some sort of
unholy change to the back end and all hell broke loose. i had dead accounts
which couldn&rsquo;t log in, i was asked to duplicate things, merges were horribly
horked up, etc. i gritted my teeth and worked through these issues. this
necessitated periodically dealing with erratic duplicate transaction explosions
which threw off budget tracking and a host of other things.</p>
<p>then about a month ago i did a little cleanup, following the directions that
mint helpfully provided. which i found irritating given that apparently there
were enough people experiencing these problems that they had to develop
documentation to facilitate manual cleanup on the part of their users. how
messed up is that? seriously, you make back end changes to your system and you
provide your customers with instructions to address the scorched earth situation
that you&rsquo;ve created? WTF?</p>
<p>following this &ldquo;clean up&rdquo;, i was left with a collection of accounts for which i
could apparently get budgeting and expense information but i could not see the
actual transactions within the accounts. double WTF? i did what you told me to
do and you don&rsquo;t even give me the courtesy of a new opportunity to clean up some
freshly created mess? you just hide a bunch of stuff i need, from me, your
apparent bitch. well, it&rsquo;s a free service so it&rsquo;s not like i&rsquo;m out any money,
just a lot of irritation and time.</p>
<p>so here&rsquo;s the recurring punchline - i&rsquo;m quite willing to spend a reasonable
amount of money for a solution that works. mint had a good chunk of the stuff
that was useful to my household and they were pretty bright about sending me
reasonable information on optimizing my finances and usage. i would happily pay
a monthly fee for online tools that work and straddle the various accounts that
i have spread hither and yon.</p>
<p>now let&rsquo;s talk about desktop software packages.</p>
<p>after trolling through various software reviews and looking at inscrutable
screenshots, perusing feature lists and getting my wife&rsquo;s input we settled on
kicking the tires on a few packages &hellip;</p>
<p>MoneyDance 2011 for the mac - sweet they have a demo i can try. crap, it&rsquo;s
limited to 100 transactions. oh, and they&rsquo;ve disabled the online banking
integration elements. shit. next.</p>
<p>iBank 4 - great a 30 day non-transaction limited demo. seems intuitive enough,
handy tool to check out the supported financial institutions for direct access.
looks like the interesting banks, brokerages, etc, are supported, sweet. start
adding them. login failure, are you sure? what? wait a second here, seriously?
try again, INBOX blinks. too many login failures? account locked? oh hell.</p>
<p>the balance of the options out there look like crap. i&rsquo;m loathe to wade through
that morass. best make one of these work.</p>
<h2 id="update---16-july-2011">update - 16-july, 2011</h2>
<p>it&rsquo;s worth pointing out that we did in fact settle upon iBank. i worked through
a handful of the foibles that i had. its ability to interact directly with the
bank in terms of getting transactions, etc. the trial leaves some of the
annoying warning dialog boxes in play despite your request to not keep showing
them in the future. this is addressed in the production paid-for version.</p>
<p>the process of getting all of your financial information from these systems and
understanding your cost-basis, etc. is largely subject to the whims of your
financial institution and their willingness to give you access to all of that
information. jp morgan chase, you can bite me. 90 days of downloadable history
is shamefully little history.</p>
<p>we&rsquo;ve actually been able to get access to information via iBank that we couldn&rsquo;t
get via mint and this has proven to be a welcome addition. the iphone app is
pretty cheesy. but it&rsquo;s useful for periodically checking what you&rsquo;re up to and
manual transaction entry is handy. things are looking up on this front, not
great, but not bad either.</p>
]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
